• Home
  • About the Firm
  • About John Tierney
  • Practice Areas
Call for a Free Case Evaluation 973-588-3050
  • Criminal Law
  • Car Accidents
  • Child Abuse
BREAKING NEWS
Experience the Court Process in Criminal Defense
Couple charged with a crime regarding vacation-club packages
Criminal charge leveled at woman who speaks out at tax meeting
U.S. Government Admits Spying on Americans
Man who admitted impersonating a police officer sues N.J. State Police claiming excessive force
Attempted carjacking turns into bizarre police chase in Trenton, police say
Lawyer disbarred for helping client hide funds from wife in divorce, then spent the money
Tenafly mom busted for hosting party with underage drinkers
Local Police Records show out-of-town drivers targeted much more frequently than residents
$5,000 reward offered in hit-and-run crash that killed man in North Plainfield

Justice system continues to review standards for juvenile crimes

Posted On 27 Sep 2012
By : janine
Comment: 0

All kids make poor decisions at some point in their lives. Usually these do not rise to the level of criminal charges in court, but when they do, what level of punishment is appropriate when a conviction is obtained? The New Jersey Supreme Court recently ruled on this issue, making it more difficult for prosecutors to try juveniles as adults.

The decision follows on the heels of other recent decisions affecting theĀ juvenile justice system. In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court abolished the death penalty for juveniles. And earlier this year, the Supreme Court struck down automatic life without parole sentences for juveniles. The decisions follow increasing evidence that children’s decision-making abilities are drastically different from adults.

In the case that spawned the decision, four juveniles face criminal charges for allegedly striking a man on the back of the head and kicking him in the face during a robbery. The charges brought against the four young men could have resulted in a maximum of 10 years behind bars. If convicted as adults, they could face up to 30 years in prison.

The Middlesex County prosecutors in the case filed to have the juveniles tried in adult court, but the family court judge hearing the case denied the request. On appeal, the decision was reversed based upon the current standard of a ‘patent and gross abuse of discretion,’ meaning that the prosecutor’s request must rise to that high standard to be refused and that they met that standard in this case. However, the state Supreme Court did not agree with that ruling.

The court felt that the existing standard was too high for making the decision at hand and voted 3-2 to give the judge a much lower standard of ‘abuse of discretion.’ The court also ruled that specific evidence warranting the move to adult court must be presented by prosecutors to prove that the move will serve as a deterrent against future crimes.

Going forward, prosecutors and defense attorneys in New Jersey will have to abide by the new guidelines. As studies continue to develop evidence about the workings of a young mind, the courts will likely continue to look to that evidence in the punishment of juvenile offenders.

Source: NorthJersey.com, “Ruling will make it more difficult to try juveniles as adults,” Anthony Campisi , Sept. 13, 2012

About the Author
  • google-share
Previous Story

New Jersey mayor faces criminal charge of corruption

Next Story

Stolen New Jersey packages lead to drug charge for woman

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

Contact John Tierney Law Firm

Name (required)

Email (required)

Phone (required)

Brief Description of Your Legal Issue

Please fill out the text below:

captcha

Recent Posts

Experience the Court Process in Criminal Defense

Posted On18 Jul 2015

Couple charged with a crime regarding vacation-club packages

Posted On29 Apr 2015

Criminal charge leveled at woman who speaks out at tax meeting

Posted On22 Mar 2015

Contact Law Office of John Tierney, LLC

1259 Route 46 East, Building 3
Suite 133
Parsippany, NJ 07054
Phone: 973-588-3050
Toll Free: 973-588-3048

Learn More

  • Home
  • About the Firm
  • About John Tierney
  • Practice Areas

Legal Blogroll

  • Meyerson Blog
  • Criminal Defense Blog
  • Daggett Shuler Blog
  • Graves McLain Blog
  • Personal Injury Blog
  • Auto Injury Blog
  • Abuse Law Blog
  • Crime Victim Blog
  • PI Law Blog
  • Bolander Group Blog
  • Tim Rayne Blog
  • Lemon Law Blog

Recent Posts

  • Experience the Court Process in Criminal Defense
  • Couple charged with a crime regarding vacation-club packages
  • Criminal charge leveled at woman who speaks out at tax meeting
  • U.S. Government Admits Spying on Americans
  • Man who admitted impersonating a police officer sues N.J. State Police claiming excessive force

Areas of Practice

Personal Injury
Criminal Defense
Civil Litigation
Municipal Court matters
Civil, General Liability Defense
Civil, Premises Liability Defense
Defense of Non-Profit charitable, educational and religious institutions
Defense of Non-Profit Youth Organizations

Copyright John Tierney 2013